Lunatics Who? Googaisan P.C – But Of course!


Seems like Googasian P.C is steadfast at repeatedly proving itself to be nothing but a bunch of incompetent lawyers as yet again the law firm has appealed for the ‘subpoena’, appearing to be ‘officially’ ridiculous.

Googasian’s last move was a motion that was but of course, discharged by the court. The motion appealed that the court officially emails the authorities of Belford to appear in the court, the court puts up a notice on a self-fabricated website of the law firm, in order to prompt the institution to come forth in the court and/or the court puts up a notice within the premises of the court to bring it to the knowledge of the public in general.

Let’s have it here for a quick recap – Googaisan P.C. has lately appealed for subpoena to be sent to Belford by the court in order to reveal the identity of the authorities behind the high school. It is however clear that subpoena is only issued in case of copy infringement. The law firm could also pursue the Digital Millennium Copyright Act in order to file a notice of infringement in this regard.

For more information see: http://www.google.com/dmca.html The aggravation in which Googaisan P.C has gotten itself, all thanks to the Belford Lawsuit and not seeing things happening n their favor, has done nothing but reduced the law firm to a mere object of amusement for common observers. Googasian P.C. also claims that Belford High School has opened up these, totally ignoring the fact that the internet is a free medium accessible to all and so possibly these websites discussing as to how Belford Lawsuit is ‘baseless’ have been started by the high school’s alumni, other online educationists, individuals considering to pursue education and life experience based diplomas/degrees online or just about anyone following the current trends of the online education industry, generally.

Such contributors speaking of how students associated with the Belford Lawsuit class action maybe counter-sued are only trying to show their own perspective in relevance to the case, based on facts easily available on the internet – be it about Belford, Googasian P.C., or other relevant cases where they may have clearly witnessed this trend of seeing only the law firm walk out with heavy amounts of profit (in case of winning the case) or being counter-sued along with the innocent participants of the class action.

,

  1. No comments yet.
(will not be published)